Page 12 - index

All these cases are long pending and kept lingering with tossing the files for one or other reason more than 4/5 months. All cases are eligible as per transfer policy TRANSFER RULING and GUIDING PRINCIPALS even though repeated requests by individuals these orders are kept pending. The only reason is all are active members of AIBSNLEA. There are still another 3/4 cases in which the transfer policy is being violated and favoritism is being made. While going through all above cases as an example it is confirmed that membership of AIBSNLEA is being harassed by tyrant Circle administration and AIBSNLEA members are unfortunate Oppressed executives. B. Violation of the Honorable Supreme Court Guidelines in recent DE L/A orders: As per the Honorable Supreme Court order list no 6 & 7 were prepared for SDE seniority by Corporate Office and Circulated to all Circles in the first week of July 15. Maharashtra Circle took two month to finalize it. Even though finalizing the list old list kept operative as the person involved in this list is AGM (A) at Circle office and active member of other Association and to favor him Circle administration kept this matter lingering with the intention best known to them. Our circle branch wrote to the circle administration but Circle administration is blindly following the tune played by other service Association. Second time also again Circle Administration has issued the DE L/A order without mentioning the specific period, is nothing but the contempt of Honorable court. At present the AGM (A) is still signing the transfer orders, which is illegal. It is requested to please look into matter and the attitude behind all the anti-Association and illegal activities must be booked. This activity is also having a vigilance angle to our opinion. Such orders against the court verdict are violation of CCS rule and the competent authority to review is none other than judiciary authority. C. Seniors are being deprived from their just legitimate right: Example 1. Dinkar Sudhir SDE Satara: The officer was transferred to NETF Circle, but get retention on 17/8/15 up to March 16.He has opted Pune/ Pune nodal as per the willingness called for by Circle Office, but his name was not included in DE L/A order which was issued after 15 days of receiving his retention order, and too much junior to him have been given DE L/A at Pune. It is an injustice to individual as well as it has violated the DE L/A policy. On the contrary the Executive from Ratnagiri who was also under transfer to Assam and no retention is being ordered and relived by Circle Office he has been given DE L/A order. Example 2. Shri Ladde from Latur The officer has opted Pune but he also being deprived the right and his name was not considered for DE L/A. D. Poor HR in considering the requests of Executives with biased mind: Here we can quote "N" no of cases, such as Smt. Thakur from Nashik, wrong stay of Mrs. Dhage from Nagar, Shri Pophale SDE Pune victim of the wrong data, without calling option from executives and by purposefully dropping the names of First three seniors in long stay list, No maintenance of proper records at HR section, deletion of waiting list case of Shri Gaikar who was made sufferer of this act done intentionally by SDE staff B and supported by the authority of HR. E. Non-maintaining the up to date HR records and its supervision, embezzlement of the records without prior approval, Processing, the files with incomplete information, and so on: Example 1. Case of Bari P.P. SDE Jalgaon: The officer has requested to WTR but his case was regretted on plea of shortage of executives and 5 officers application were sent for ITPC and back door forwarding of request of a SDE from Nashik to NCNGN, Keeping Rule 8 transfer applications pending since long back, smells the wrong doings and ill intention of the administration. Example 2. Case of Pokale DE Beed: The officer has been transferred to CO Mumbai on promotion as Adhoc DE in July 2013 but as the officer has medical problem the circle administration has given him retention up to August 14 as Adhoc DE transfer. In September 14 the officer was promoted as Regular DE and posted at Beed. Now the Circle office is reliving him through ERP on order issued in Feb 15 under reference to order dated for adhoc 30/09/2015 under reference order of Adhoc DE. As per transfer policy he is not senior and thus violated transfer policy. In Beed one DE is going to retire in Nov 15 and another SDE is DE L/A. We think circle office is Joking. A loose administration is being exhibited. This is because the officer is AIBSNLEA member. Similar case of Mundhe DE as his sister who was medically challenged and widow and paralytic dependent on the officer makes him eligible toget immunity from transfer but even he represent he was forced to relive and the poor officer join his new assignment. So cruel behavior and at last her sister passed away and the officer was unable to serve sister in her last days. TELEWAVE Page-12 SEPTEMBER-2015