Page 55 - TELEWAVE JUNE-2016

3. SC / ST JTOs qualified in the qualifying part of LDCE 2000. 23.03.1999: Kerala Circle disallowed 14 SDEs promoted up to 1994 to the LDCE 2000. 27.04.2001 - CAT, ERK - OA 91/1999: rd Para 2 - “It was stated (by DOT) that 3629 JTOs promoted vide order dated 29.10.1998 belonged to the 2/3 rd quota and it did not include 1/3 quota and that from 1992 to 1996 up to 22.7.96 there were 1242, 992, 1843 rd and 1814 vacancies available in Group-B against 1/3 quota for each of the years. Para 3 – They (DOT) submitted that the qualifying examination to TES Group-B was conducted up to 1991 and as at that time a large number of qualified JTOs were awaiting their promotion it was decided to suspend the examination for three years which was later extended to another three years. Thereafter, the R/Rules were modified dispensing with the qualifying examination from 23.07.1996. (Here also nobody challenged the suspension of LDCE for six years.) Para 16 – We direct the respondents to conduct a Special Supplementary Qualifying - cum- Competitive Examination in continuation of the one conducted in 2000 and the applicant and others similarly placed should be allowed to participate. 22.05.2001 - CAT, ERK - OA 1633/1998: Following the directions given in OA 91/99, we direct the respondents to conduct a special Supplementary Qualifying – cum Competitive Examination in continuation of the one conducted already. 28.01.2002 – Kerala High Court – IA No. 35256/2001 in CMP No. 60734/2001 in OP No. 21656/2001: The petitioners shall conduct a special Supplementary Qualifying – cum Competitive Examination in continuation of the one conducted in 2000. The results also shall be published. However, the question of considering them rd for promotion against the 33 1/3 quota will be decided while disposing of the OP. 04.02.2002: Only 16 JTOs (5 OC & 11 SC) were declared successful in LDCE 2000. 18.02.2002: 16 JTOs who were declared successful in LDCE 2000 were promoted. 03.04.2002 - CAT, ERK – OA 213/2002: 1. The court directed DoT to reply the applicants (T Bennet & T V Mathews) suitably within 2 months. 2. DoT replied that JTOs promoted to SDEs up to DPC 1994 were not allowed to the LDCE 2000/2003. 11.11.2002: 6 more JTOs were declared successful in LDCE 2000 and were promoted. 24.07.2003: Special Supplementary LDCE 2003 notified: It allowed only the following: 1. All JTOs qualified up to 1991 but, not promoted till DPC 1994 for any reason. 2. SDEs promoted only through 1998 DPC. 3. OC / SC / ST JTOs qualified in the qualifying part of Special Supplementary LDCE 2003. 02.08.2004 - Kerala High Court– IA9809/2004 in OP 21656/2001: Court directed to publish LDCE results. 09.09.2004: 35 JTOs were declared successful in Special Supplementary LDCE 2003. 09.11.2004: 53 more JTOs were declared successful in Special Supplementary LDCE 2003. 10.11.2004: 3 more JTOs were declared successful in Special Supplementary LDCE 2003. 13.11.2004: 31 more JTOs were declared successful in Special Supplementary LDCE 2003. 11.02.2005 – Kerala High Court – IA No. 1545/2005 in CMP No. 60734/2001 in OP No. 37134/2001(S): The rd writ petitioners are directed to make promotions against the quota of 33 1/3 on the basis of the results, subject to the final outcome in OP Nos. 37134 & 21656 of 2001. 22.03.2005: 122 JTOs who were declared successful in Special Supplementary LDCE 2003 were promoted. 13.07.2006 – Kerala High Court – OP Nos. 37134 & 21656/2001: 1. They were promoted but, no seniority has been assigned. None has so far challenged this. 2. The incumbents shall be placed against vacancies arisen before 22.07.1996 and above the persons TELEWAVE 55 JUNE-2016